A few days ago, a group of us had a discussion; the topic
was love. It started from a brief
conversation that was had with someone at church, and the comment was made, “I
love you, brother.” That comment just
felt too Christian-ese to the listener, too much of a church cliché, like when
someone says they’ll pray for you as they slap you on the back and walk
away.
The thought that went through the listener’s head was, “How
can you love me? You don’t even know me,”
and that started the discussion on whether there can be love when there’s no
relationship. The viewpoint was that if
you loved someone, you were going to be in there life, that there would be
relationship, and that absent that, there couldn’t be love.
One segment of the group didn’t totally agree with that position. This segment, and it was me, said that it was
possible to have love for someone without having relationship. I asked if it was necessary to push your way
into someone’s life and intrude in their space to prove that you love
them. I do my best to respect people’s
time and space, and I’m a firm believer that if someone’s not interested in
giving you their time, then they’re not really interested in you being in their
space. Making yourself available to whatever someone
needs, whenever they need it, certainly there’s love there, wouldn’t you
agree? There are a number of people for
whom I have love, who I have little contact with, but they still know, I believe, that
if they ever needed anything, I’d be there in a heartbeat.
After all, loving someone is wanting the best for them, and
doing whatever is needed to attain that, even if that is merely being there
only when you’re needed.
Is that a cop-out?
Is the act of establishing a close relationship with someone necessary for love to be involved?
Is that a cop-out?
Is the act of establishing a close relationship with someone necessary for love to be involved?
A segment of the group felt strongly that if you were going
to show true love, then you were going to make huge efforts to be in their
life, to know exactly what to provide when they’re in need. There’s truth to that argument, and I won’t
deny that, however, I couldn’t agree with the position that without
relationship, there could be no real love.
The parable of the Good Samaritan had been brought up
earlier in the conversation, and I circled back to it to prove my point. Essentially, the parable was used to answer
the question of who is our neighbor.
Yet, it was the follow up to the command to love your neighbor as
yourself. It’s clearly established that
the Samaritan had no relationship with the injured man. In fact, there was a history of animosity
between the two entities. However, the
Samaritan was there in the man’s time of need. This parable was used to
illustrate what it’s like to love your neighbor. The Samaritan didn’t even know the man and
yet gave of himself, and helped him overcome his ordeal. The Samaritan gave of himself, his time, his
resources to a man he did not even know.
Obviously, the parable was not intended to be used as a
road map to how to avoid relationships and yet still give love. It was used to highlight the point that you
can love others, by giving of yourself, even to those you don’t even know. It also hammers home the point that real love
is the giving of yourself, your time, your resources without any expectation of
reciprocity.
Ultimately, the topic of the conversation became:
Are Christians showing enough love to others?
Have Christians, as a whole, failed in loving others?
Are Christians merely giving platitudes when they say they’re going to keep someone in prayer?
There is a truth that relationships and love go hand in
hand.
Perhaps that’s what it is: the deeper the relationship, the stronger love that can be shown.
Perhaps that’s what it is: the deeper the relationship, the stronger love that can be shown.
Yet, that shouldn’t be used to limit ourselves to the thought that there could
be no love without relationship. The
Good Samaritan proved that some of the greatest acts of love can be shown to
those that are not known to us.
Perhaps that’s the lesson for Christians during this time;
at a time when people are afraid, at a time when people are in need for basic
items, at a time when hope is fading.
Have Christians, as a whole, in recent times, failed in
showing love to others? Perhaps.
Perhaps all that can change in this moment of history.
Perhaps all that can change in this moment of history.